Ah...the indie movie. Remember when Reservoir Dogs was supposed to be indie? I don't either, I'd classify it as more alternative than anything, but that's just labels. We're not here to talk about labels today. We're here to talk about how much I hate indie movies and the attitude that anything not mainstream is good.
You'll never forget it, whether you loved it or hated it, the first time you saw a movie that you just couldn't understand. For some people it was because the material covered was just too hard to wrap their mind around at the time. For others, it was because the movie was awful. Well, if your first experience with this was an indie movie, it was probably both.
Now, I'm not talking indie movies in the sense of low-budget affairs that end up way better than they had any right to be.
I am talking about the actually high-budget, A-list garbage that is cranked out by stars who "just want their image seen". Let me ask you this, why does their image always involve them looking mopey while a Tori Amos song wails in the background and a girl/guy acts disinterested in them?
I can't understand it. And its not because those movies are above me or something. Its just because they're bad fucking movies. There's a huge difference between those categories. And the people that jump on the indie bandwagon just because they can, need to wake the fuck up.
A four hour black and white French movie about horses is not entertaining. Its barely even art. Its that kind of avant garde bullshit that annoys the piss out of me. And yeah, you're probably sitting there thinking "how American or you".
Yeah, that goes right to the heart. Seriously, wounded. No, its not the red-blooded, beer drinking, ass kicking American in me coming out. Its the person who loves movies. I have appreciation for all kinds of movies. On my movie shelf sits classics. Real, true to life classics. And cuddled up next to them? Shit like The Room, countless MST3K DVDs, Simpsons seasons and a season of Heroes that I'm not particularly proud of owning. And there's also stuff like Charlie Bartlett, Boondock Saints, King of Kong, etc. I like anything if its good.
But therein lies the problem. I like stuff that you don't and vice versa. And here is where this whole trip gets strange, sometimes those lines cross. Sometimes.
I don't despise all independent movies. But there has to be a stark difference. You can't just throw that label on everything that doesn't come from one of the big distributors. Or else I'll fall into the trap that I'm sure some people have in thinking that Juno was a good movie. Its not. Its a fucking boring quirkfest with weird ass music and Michael Cera...and Jason Bateman its a fucking Clooney away from being IFC's biggest circle jerk.
And please, don't think I'm ill-informed. I've watched plenty of this garbage. Most of it stars Kat Dennings, but that's a story for a different time. You guys can't rush into something on the off-chance that it might be good because its different. That's how we gave power to Sundance. And let me ask you, what did that get us?? Hmm? Exactly.
So what can we do about this affliction? Closing vintage clothing stores en masse would be a good start. But since we can't do that, I say that we do what we should always do when something needs to change, vote with our wallets. Do you honestly want Kirsten Dunst to direct anything? What's next, Robert Pattinson and Spielberg teaming-up for an in-depth look at relationships on the coast of Iceland during hunting season? I don't want to live in that world.
So, I'll be going to see The Avengers. I'll be going to see Batman and whatever the hell else looks like it may be good. I won't go see something just because its directly parallel to something else. That's backwards thinking and will do no good. Besides, every time you actually seek out a five hour long movie from the black heart of Switzerland, God makes another Fred Durst. No, those two things aren't related in any way, but do you want to take that chance?
Keep on rollin'